unemployment: was figured in great depression

Related concepts

Parents	income Weight: 0.66 , indicator Weight: 0.66 , spending Weight: 0.64 , benefit Weight: 0.63 , situation Weight: 0.63
Siblings	income tax Weight: 0.35 , poverty Weight: 0.34 , economy Weight: 0.34 , unearned income Weight: 0.33 , crisis Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was figured in great depression	1.00
was figured in depression	0.97
be figured	0.86
was high during depression	0.83
is depression	0.82
feel good	0.77
is when good	0.76
be when good	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(unemployment, was figured in great depression)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(spending, feel good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(spending, feel good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(economy, is when good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(economy, be when good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(unemployment, was figured in great depression)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(economy, be when good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(economy, be when good)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(economy, is when good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(economy, is when good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(unemployment, was figured in great depression)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(unemployment, was figured in depression)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(unemployment, was figured in depression)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(unemployment, was figured in depression)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(unemployment, be figured)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(unemployment, be figured)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(unemployment, was high during depression)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(unemployment, be figured)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(unemployment, was high during depression)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(unemployment, is depression)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(unemployment, was high during depression)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(unemployment, is depression)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(unemployment, is depression)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, was high during depression)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, was figured in depression)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be figured)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is depression)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, was figured in great depression)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(unemployment, was figured in great depression)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(spending, feel good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(economy, be when good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(economy, is when good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(unemployment, was figured in great depression) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(spending, feel good)