unicorn: has physical part can

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, character
Weight: 0.57
Siblings komodo dragon
Weight: 0.39
, monkey
Weight: 0.38
, dragon
Weight: 0.38
, lizard
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part can 1.00
has physical part hornss 0.93
has physical part wings 0.80
is in 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(unicorn, has physical part can)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dragon, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(unicorn, has physical part can)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(dragon, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(dragon, has physical part wings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(unicorn, has physical part can)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(unicorn, has physical part can)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(unicorn, has physical part can)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(unicorn, has physical part wings)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(unicorn, has physical part can)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(unicorn, has physical part wings)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(unicorn, has physical part can)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(unicorn, has physical part wings)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(unicorn, has physical part can)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(unicorn, has physical part wings)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(unicorn, has physical part can)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(unicorn, is in)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(unicorn, has physical part can)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(unicorn, is in)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(unicorn, has physical part can)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(unicorn, is in)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(unicorn, has physical part can)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(unicorn, is in)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(unicorn, has physical part can)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(unicorn, has physical part can)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(unicorn, has physical part can)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(unicorn, has physical part can)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(unicorn, has physical part can)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(unicorn, has physical part can)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(dragon, has physical part wings)