unicorn: were extinct

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, character
Weight: 0.57
Siblings komodo dragon
Weight: 0.39
, monkey
Weight: 0.38
, dragon
Weight: 0.38
, lizard
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
were extinct 1.00
is extinct 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unicorn, were extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, is extinct)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unicorn, were extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(monkey, is extinct)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(unicorn, were extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(komodo dragon, is extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, is extinct)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(unicorn, were extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(monkey, is extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(monkey, is extinct)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(unicorn, were extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(unicorn, were extinct)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(unicorn, were extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(unicorn, is extinct)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(unicorn, were extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(unicorn, is extinct)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(unicorn, were extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(unicorn, is extinct)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(unicorn, were extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(unicorn, is extinct)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(unicorn, were extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(unicorn, were extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unicorn, were extinct)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(unicorn, were extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(unicorn, were extinct)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unicorn, were extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, is extinct)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unicorn, were extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(monkey, is extinct)