union: be at construction business

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.61
, club
Weight: 0.61
, county
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, party
Weight: 0.59
Siblings labor
Weight: 0.34
, quebec city
Weight: 0.33
, political party
Weight: 0.33
, employer
Weight: 0.32
, golf club
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at construction business 1.00
be used to business 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(city, be used to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(union, be at construction business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(union, be at construction business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(city, be used to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(union, be at construction business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(city, be used to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(city, be used to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(union, be at construction business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(union, be at construction business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(union, be at construction business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(union, be at construction business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(union, be at construction business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(union, be at construction business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(union, be at construction business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(union, be at construction business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(union, be at construction business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(union, be at construction business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(city, be used to business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(union, be at construction business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(city, be used to business)