union: be good for workers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.61
, club
Weight: 0.61
, county
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, party
Weight: 0.59
Siblings labor
Weight: 0.34
, labour party
Weight: 0.33
, quebec city
Weight: 0.33
, political party
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for workers 1.00
be important for workers 0.97
be important for day workers 0.94
help workers 0.94
be important for young workers 0.93
be very important to workers 0.92
be important for present day workers 0.90
be good for employees 0.90
benefit workers 0.90
protect bad workers 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(union, be good for workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(union, be good for workers)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(union, be good for workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(union, help workers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(union, be good for workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(union, be important for young workers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(union, be good for workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(union, help workers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(union, be good for workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(union, be good for employees)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(union, be good for workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(union, be important for young workers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(union, be good for workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(union, be good for employees)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(union, be good for workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(union, help workers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(union, be good for workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(union, help workers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(union, be good for workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(union, be good for employees)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(union, be good for workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(union, be good for employees)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(union, be good for workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(union, be important for young workers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(union, be good for workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(union, be important for young workers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(union, be good for workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(union, be good for workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(union, be good for workers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(union, be good for workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(union, be good for workers)