union: be important in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.61
, club
Weight: 0.61
, county
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, party
Weight: 0.59
Siblings labor
Weight: 0.34
, quebec city
Weight: 0.33
, political party
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in canada 1.00
be much stronger in canada 0.89
decline in canada 0.87
be needed in america 0.79
be good for america 0.79
relate to america 0.76
be popular in new zealand 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(union, be important in canada)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(union, be important in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(party, be important in canada)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(party, be good for america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(party, be important in canada)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(party, be good for america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(political party, be important in canada)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(union, be important in canada)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(union, be important in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(political party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(political party, be important in canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(union, be important in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(union, decline in canada)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(union, decline in canada)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(union, relate to america)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(union, decline in canada)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(union, be much stronger in canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(union, be much stronger in canada)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(union, decline in canada)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(union, be much stronger in canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(union, be much stronger in canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(union, be needed in america)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(union, relate to america)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(union, be good for america)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(union, be needed in america)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(union, be popular in new zealand)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(union, relate to america)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(union, be needed in america)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(union, be popular in new zealand)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(union, be good for america)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(union, be popular in new zealand)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(union, be good for america)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(union, be popular in new zealand)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(union, be needed in america)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(union, be good for america)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(union, relate to america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(union, be important in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(union, be important in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(party, be important in canada)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(party, be good for america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(political party, be important in canada)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(party, be important in canada)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(union, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(party, be good for america)