union: be popular in new zealand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.61
, club
Weight: 0.61
, county
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, party
Weight: 0.59
Siblings labor
Weight: 0.34
, quebec city
Weight: 0.33
, political party
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in new zealand 1.00
be important in canada 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(party, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(union, be popular in new zealand)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(union, be popular in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(party, be important in canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(union, be popular in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(party, be important in canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(union, be popular in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(political party, be important in canada)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(party, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(union, be popular in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(union, be popular in new zealand)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(union, be popular in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(political party, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(political party, be important in canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(union, be popular in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(union, be popular in new zealand)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(union, be popular in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(union, be important in canada)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(union, be popular in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(union, be important in canada)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(union, be popular in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(union, be important in canada)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(union, be popular in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(union, be important in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(union, be popular in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(union, be popular in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(union, be popular in new zealand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(union, be popular in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(union, be popular in new zealand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(union, be popular in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(party, be important in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(union, be popular in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(political party, be important in canada)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(union, be popular in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(party, be important in canada)