union: were formed

Related concepts

Parents	city Weight: 0.61 , club Weight: 0.61 , county Weight: 0.59 , institution Weight: 0.59 , party Weight: 0.59
Siblings	labor Weight: 0.34 , labour party Weight: 0.33 , quebec city Weight: 0.33 , political party Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were formed	1.00
is formed	0.94
were created	0.85
were formed in 19th century	0.84
were formed in century	0.84
were formed during revolution	0.83
were formed in late 19th century	0.83
were formed in late century	0.83
were formed during industrial revolution	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(party, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(union, were formed)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(party, is formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(union, were formed)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(institution, is formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(union, were formed)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(party, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(union, were formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(institution, is formed)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(party, were formed)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(party, is formed)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(party, were created)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(party, were created)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(party, were formed)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(institution, is formed)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(party, is formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(political party, were formed)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(political party, is formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(party, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(union, were formed)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(party, is formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(union, were formed)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(institution, is formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(union, were formed)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(party, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(union, were formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(political party, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(political party, were formed)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(political party, is formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(political party, is formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(union, were formed)

Similarity expansion

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(union, were created)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(union, were formed in late 19th century)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(union, were formed during industrial revolution)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(union, were formed during industrial revolution)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(union, were formed during industrial revolution)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(union, were formed in late 19th century)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(union, were created)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(union, were created)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.12

Typical(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(union, were created)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.12

Typical(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(union, were formed during industrial revolution)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(union, were formed in late 19th century)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.12

Typical(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(union, were formed in late 19th century)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(union, were formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(union, were formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(institution, is formed)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(party, is formed)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(party, were formed)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(party, were created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(political party, is formed)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(political party, were formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.12

Typical(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(institution, is formed)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.12

Typical(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(party, is formed)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Typical(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(party, were formed)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.12

Typical(union, were formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(party, were created)