unit: be important in calculations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, market
Weight: 0.61
, office
Weight: 0.60
Siblings central processing unit
Weight: 0.79
, battalion
Weight: 0.72
, division
Weight: 0.69
, processor
Weight: 0.66
, department
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in calculations 1.00
be treated in calculations 0.94
be calculated 0.79
work in analysis 0.77
be defined in arithmetic 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(area, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(unit, be important in calculations)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(area, be calculated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(area, be calculated)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(division, be defined in arithmetic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(area, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(unit, be important in calculations)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(division, be defined in arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(division, be defined in arithmetic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(unit, be important in calculations)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(unit, be treated in calculations)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(unit, be treated in calculations)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(unit, be treated in calculations)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(unit, be calculated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(unit, be calculated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(unit, be calculated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(unit, be treated in calculations)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(unit, work in analysis)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(unit, work in analysis)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(unit, work in analysis)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(unit, work in analysis)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(unit, be calculated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(unit, be important in calculations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(unit, be important in calculations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(area, be calculated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(division, be defined in arithmetic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(unit, be important in calculations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(area, be calculated)