unit: be in use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, market
Weight: 0.61
, office
Weight: 0.60
Siblings central processing unit
Weight: 0.79
, battalion
Weight: 0.72
, division
Weight: 0.69
, processor
Weight: 0.66
, department
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in use 1.00
be in use today 0.90
be used for area 0.78
be available for help 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(office, be available for help) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(unit, be in use)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(unit, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(office, be available for help)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(unit, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(office, be available for help)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(office, be available for help) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(unit, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(unit, be in use)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(unit, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(unit, be in use)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(unit, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(unit, be in use today)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(unit, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(unit, be used for area)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(unit, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(unit, be in use today)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(unit, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(unit, be in use today)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(unit, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(unit, be in use today)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(unit, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(unit, be used for area)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(unit, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(unit, be used for area)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(unit, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(unit, be used for area)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(unit, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(unit, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(unit, be in use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(unit, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(unit, be in use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(unit, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(office, be available for help)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(unit, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(office, be available for help)