unit: work in analysis

Property	Similarity
work in analysis	1.00
work in dimensional analysis	0.85
be important in calculations	0.77
be comparable research for appraisals	0.77
be needed report	0.75
be treated in calculations	0.75

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(unit, work in analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(unit, work in dimensional analysis)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(unit, work in analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(unit, work in dimensional analysis)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(unit, work in analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(unit, work in dimensional analysis)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(unit, work in analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(unit, work in dimensional analysis)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(unit, work in analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(unit, be treated in calculations)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(unit, work in analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(unit, be important in calculations)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(unit, work in analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(unit, be needed report)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(unit, work in analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(unit, be important in calculations)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(unit, work in analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(unit, be needed report)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(unit, work in analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(unit, be treated in calculations)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(unit, work in analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(unit, be treated in calculations)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(unit, work in analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(unit, be needed report)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(unit, work in analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(unit, be important in calculations)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(unit, work in analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(unit, be needed report)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(unit, work in analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(unit, be important in calculations)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(unit, work in analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(unit, be treated in calculations)

Parents	area Weight: 0.63 , facility Weight: 0.63 , market Weight: 0.61 , office Weight: 0.60
Siblings	central processing unit Weight: 0.79 , battalion Weight: 0.72 , division Weight: 0.69 , processor Weight: 0.66 , department Weight: 0.64

unit: work in analysis

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible