unix: be better for programming

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents os
Weight: 0.68
, operating system
Weight: 0.65
, technology
Weight: 0.55
, system
Weight: 0.53
, tool
Weight: 0.53
Siblings microsoft
Weight: 0.38
, linux
Weight: 0.38
, macintosh
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better for programming 1.00
be good for programming 0.97
be useful in programming 0.92
be useful in shell programming 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(unix, be better for programming)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(unix, be better for programming)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(unix, be better for programming)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(unix, be good for programming)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(unix, be better for programming)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(unix, be useful in programming)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(unix, be better for programming)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(unix, be good for programming)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(unix, be better for programming)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(unix, be good for programming)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(unix, be better for programming)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(unix, be good for programming)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(unix, be better for programming)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(unix, be useful in programming)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(unix, be better for programming)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(unix, be useful in programming)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(unix, be better for programming)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(unix, be useful in shell programming)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(unix, be better for programming)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(unix, be useful in programming)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(unix, be better for programming)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(unix, be useful in shell programming)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(unix, be better for programming)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(unix, be useful in shell programming)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(unix, be better for programming)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(unix, be useful in shell programming)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(unix, be better for programming)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(unix, be better for programming)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(unix, be better for programming)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(unix, be better for programming)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(unix, be better for programming)