up: be in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.58
, direction
Weight: 0.58
, process
Weight: 0.56
, organization
Weight: 0.56
Siblings down
Weight: 0.35
, out
Weight: 0.33
, away
Weight: 0.32
, back
Weight: 0.32
, big bang
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in business 1.00
be important in business 0.94
be in business retail 0.88
be good company work for 0.80
be good company work 0.80
think important in operations management 0.77
have for customer service different from other mission statemants 0.77
need vsphere with operations management 0.77
be integral part of business 0.76
is great company 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(process, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(up, be in business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(organization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(up, be in business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(process, think important in operations management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(up, be in business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(organization, be in business retail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(up, be in business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(organization, have for customer service different from other mission statemants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(up, be in business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(organization, be integral part of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(up, be in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(organization, be in business retail)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(organization, be important in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(process, be important in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(organization, be integral part of business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(organization, have for customer service different from other mission statemants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(process, think important in operations management)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(process, be important in business)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(organization, be in business retail)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(process, think important in operations management)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(organization, be important in business)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(organization, have for customer service different from other mission statemants)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(organization, be integral part of business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(process, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(up, be in business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(organization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(up, be in business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(organization, be in business retail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(up, be in business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(process, think important in operations management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(up, be in business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(organization, have for customer service different from other mission statemants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(up, be in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(organization, be integral part of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(up, be in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(up, be in business)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(up, be good company work for)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(up, be good company work for)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(up, be good company work for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(up, be in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(up, be in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(organization, be integral part of business)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(organization, be in business retail)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(organization, be important in business)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(organization, have for customer service different from other mission statemants)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(process, think important in operations management)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(organization, be in business retail)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(organization, be important in business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(organization, be integral part of business)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, be important in business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(organization, have for customer service different from other mission statemants)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(up, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(process, think important in operations management)