up: be in michigan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.58
, direction
Weight: 0.58
, process
Weight: 0.56
, organization
Weight: 0.56
Siblings down
Weight: 0.35
, out
Weight: 0.33
, away
Weight: 0.32
, back
Weight: 0.32
, big bang
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in michigan 1.00
be part of michigan 0.99
be in louisville 0.80
be available from york york to paris france 0.80
be available from new york york to paris france 0.80
be available from york new york to paris france 0.80
be available from york to paris france 0.80
be available from new york new york to paris france 0.79
be available from new york to paris france 0.79
go through kentucky 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(direction, be available from york york to paris france)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(up, be in michigan)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(direction, be available from york new york to paris france)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(up, be in michigan)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(direction, be available from new york york to paris france)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(up, be in michigan)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(direction, be available from york to paris france)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(up, be in michigan)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(direction, be available from new york new york to paris france)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(up, be in michigan)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(direction, be available from new york to paris france)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(up, be in michigan)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(direction, be available from york york to paris france)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(direction, be available from new york york to paris france)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(direction, be available from york new york to paris france)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(direction, be available from york to paris france)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(direction, be available from new york to paris france)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(direction, be available from new york new york to paris france)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(direction, be available from york york to paris france)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(direction, be available from york to paris france)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(direction, be available from new york york to paris france)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(direction, be available from york new york to paris france)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(direction, be available from new york to paris france)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(direction, be available from new york new york to paris france)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(direction, be available from york york to paris france)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(up, be in michigan)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(direction, be available from york new york to paris france)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(up, be in michigan)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(direction, be available from new york york to paris france)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(up, be in michigan)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(direction, be available from york to paris france)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(up, be in michigan)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(direction, be available from new york new york to paris france)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(up, be in michigan)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(direction, be available from new york to paris france)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(up, be in michigan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(up, be in michigan)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(up, be part of michigan)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(up, be part of michigan)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(up, be part of michigan)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(up, be part of michigan)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(up, be in louisville)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(up, be in louisville)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(up, be in louisville)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(up, be in louisville)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(up, be in michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(up, be in michigan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(direction, be available from york york to paris france)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(direction, be available from new york york to paris france)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(direction, be available from york new york to paris france)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(direction, be available from york to paris france)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(direction, be available from new york to paris france)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(direction, be available from new york new york to paris france)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(direction, be available from york york to paris france)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(direction, be available from new york york to paris france)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(direction, be available from york new york to paris france)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(direction, be available from york to paris france)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(direction, be available from new york new york to paris france)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(up, be in michigan)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(direction, be available from new york to paris france)