up: be more expensive than usps

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.58
, direction
Weight: 0.58
, process
Weight: 0.56
, organization
Weight: 0.56
Siblings down
Weight: 0.35
, out
Weight: 0.33
, away
Weight: 0.32
, back
Weight: 0.32
, big bang
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than usps 1.00
be better than usps 0.91
be much worse than usps 0.88
is expensive 0.85
be more important than product 0.81
make less money 0.81
use usps 0.81
pay more than fedex 0.80
get paid less 0.80
be rather than sale 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(up, be more expensive than usps)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(process, be rather than sale)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(up, be more expensive than usps)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(process, be rather than sale)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(process, be more important than product)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(process, be more important than product)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(process, be rather than sale)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(back, get paid less)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(back, make less money)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(up, be more expensive than usps)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(process, be rather than sale)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(up, be more expensive than usps)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(back, make less money)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(back, make less money)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(back, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(back, get paid less)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(up, be more expensive than usps)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(up, use usps)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(up, be better than usps)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(up, be better than usps)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(up, be better than usps)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(up, be better than usps)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(up, use usps)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(up, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(up, use usps)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(up, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(up, use usps)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(up, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(up, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(up, be more expensive than usps)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(up, be more expensive than usps)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(process, be rather than sale)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(process, be more important than product)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(back, make less money)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(back, get paid less)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(process, be rather than sale)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(up, be more expensive than usps)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(process, be more important than product)