uracil: has quality difference

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pyrimidine
Weight: 0.52
, basis
Weight: 0.45
, combination
Weight: 0.40
, derivative
Weight: 0.38
, pyridine
Weight: 0.38
Siblings cytosine
Weight: 0.32
, guanine
Weight: 0.32
, thymine
Weight: 0.32
, amine
Weight: 0.28
, ampicillin
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality difference 1.00
has quality good 0.80
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(basis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(uracil, has quality difference)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(derivative, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(uracil, has quality difference)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(derivative, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(basis, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(derivative, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(basis, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thymine, has quality difference)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(amine, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(basis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(uracil, has quality difference)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(derivative, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(uracil, has quality difference)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(thymine, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(thymine, has quality difference)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(amine, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(uracil, has quality difference)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(uracil, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(uracil, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(uracil, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(uracil, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(uracil, has quality difference)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(uracil, has quality difference)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(derivative, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(basis, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(thymine, has quality difference)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(amine, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(derivative, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(uracil, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(basis, has quality good)