user: safeguard against computer worms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consumer
Weight: 0.64
, person
Weight: 0.63
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.62
, element
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer programmer
Weight: 0.67
, computer user
Weight: 0.67
, dealer
Weight: 0.60
, cyclist
Weight: 0.60
, partner
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
safeguard against computer worms 1.00
use computer 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(user, safeguard against computer worms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(computer user, use computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(user, safeguard against computer worms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(computer user, use computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(computer user, use computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(user, safeguard against computer worms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(user, safeguard against computer worms)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(user, safeguard against computer worms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(user, use computer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(user, safeguard against computer worms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(user, use computer)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(user, safeguard against computer worms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(user, use computer)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(user, safeguard against computer worms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(user, use computer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(user, safeguard against computer worms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(user, safeguard against computer worms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(user, safeguard against computer worms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(user, safeguard against computer worms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(user, safeguard against computer worms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(user, safeguard against computer worms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(computer user, use computer)