user: use dashboard software

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consumer
Weight: 0.64
, person
Weight: 0.63
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.62
, element
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer programmer
Weight: 0.67
, computer user
Weight: 0.67
, dealer
Weight: 0.60
, cyclist
Weight: 0.60
, partner
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
use dashboard software 1.00
is interface 0.80
use computer 0.76
work via windows computer 0.76
access information from companys internal database trough 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(computer user, use computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(computer user, use computer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(computer user, use computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(user, use dashboard software)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(user, is interface)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(user, is interface)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(user, use computer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(user, is interface)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(user, use computer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(user, use computer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(user, work via windows computer)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(user, work via windows computer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(user, work via windows computer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(user, access information from companys internal database trough)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(user, work via windows computer)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(user, access information from companys internal database trough)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(user, access information from companys internal database trough)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(user, access information from companys internal database trough)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(user, use computer)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(user, is interface)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(user, use dashboard software)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(user, use dashboard software)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(user, use dashboard software)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(computer user, use computer)