user: work via windows computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consumer
Weight: 0.64
, person
Weight: 0.63
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.62
, element
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer programmer
Weight: 0.67
, computer user
Weight: 0.67
, dealer
Weight: 0.60
, cyclist
Weight: 0.60
, partner
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
work via windows computer 1.00
use computer 0.86
use dashboard software 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(user, work via windows computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(computer user, use computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(user, work via windows computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(computer user, use computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(computer user, use computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(user, work via windows computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(user, work via windows computer)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(user, work via windows computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(user, use computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(user, work via windows computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(user, use computer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(user, work via windows computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(user, use computer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(user, work via windows computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(user, use dashboard software)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(user, work via windows computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(user, use dashboard software)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(user, work via windows computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(user, use dashboard software)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(user, work via windows computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(user, use dashboard software)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(user, work via windows computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(user, use computer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(user, work via windows computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(user, work via windows computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(user, work via windows computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(user, work via windows computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(user, work via windows computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(user, work via windows computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(computer user, use computer)