utensil: be have plastic coating

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.66
, cooking
Weight: 0.52
, object
Weight: 0.52
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.77
, spoon
Weight: 0.74
, razor blade
Weight: 0.70
, frying pan
Weight: 0.64
, scissors
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be have plastic coating 1.00
be have coating 0.96
be made of plastic 0.85
have made of wood plastic 0.83
be have plastic surgery 0.77
have plastic handles 0.77
be made of aluminum 0.77
be made of metal 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(scissors, be made of metal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, have plastic handles)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(frying pan, be made of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(scissors, be made of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(scissors, be made of metal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(spoon, be made of metal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(frying pan, have plastic handles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(frying pan, have plastic handles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(utensil, be have plastic coating)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(utensil, be have coating)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(utensil, be have coating)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(utensil, be have coating)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(utensil, be have plastic surgery)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(utensil, be have plastic surgery)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic surgery)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(utensil, be have plastic surgery)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of metal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of metal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of metal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(utensil, have plastic handles)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of metal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(utensil, have plastic handles)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(utensil, have plastic handles)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be have coating)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have plastic handles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic coating)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(utensil, be have plastic coating)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(scissors, be made of metal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(spoon, be made of metal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic coating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(frying pan, have plastic handles)