utensil: handles have made of bakelite

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.66
, cooking
Weight: 0.52
, object
Weight: 0.52
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.77
, spoon
Weight: 0.74
, razor blade
Weight: 0.70
, frying pan
Weight: 0.64
, scissors
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
handles have made of bakelite 1.00
have have made of bakelite 0.92
handles have made 0.90
have plastic handles 0.89
have handles 0.88
have wooden handles 0.86
be provided with wooden handles 0.84
be provided with handles 0.83
be made up of metal 0.75
be made of plastic 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, have plastic handles)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, have handles)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(frying pan, have handles)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(frying pan, have handles)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(frying pan, have plastic handles)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(frying pan, have plastic handles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(utensil, handles have made)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(utensil, have handles)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(utensil, handles have made)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(utensil, have handles)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(utensil, handles have made)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(utensil, have handles)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(utensil, be provided with handles)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(utensil, have plastic handles)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(utensil, have wooden handles)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(utensil, be provided with handles)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(utensil, be provided with wooden handles)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(utensil, have plastic handles)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(utensil, have plastic handles)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(utensil, be provided with wooden handles)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have plastic handles)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(utensil, have wooden handles)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(utensil, have wooden handles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(utensil, be provided with wooden handles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(utensil, be provided with handles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be provided with wooden handles)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have wooden handles)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(utensil, handles have made)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have handles)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be provided with handles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(frying pan, have plastic handles)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(frying pan, have handles)