utensil: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.66
, cooking
Weight: 0.52
, object
Weight: 0.52
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.77
, spoon
Weight: 0.74
, razor blade
Weight: 0.70
, frying pan
Weight: 0.64
, scissors
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
has quality bad 0.82
has quality use 0.81
is value 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cooking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cooking, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cooking, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, is value)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(spoon, is value)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cooking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(utensil, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(spoon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(spoon, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(spoon, is value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(spoon, is value)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(razor blade, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(razor blade, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(frying pan, is value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(frying pan, is value)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(utensil, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(utensil, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(utensil, has quality use)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(utensil, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(utensil, is value)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is value)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality use)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(utensil, has quality use)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality use)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(utensil, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(utensil, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(utensil, is value)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(utensil, is value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cooking, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(spoon, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(spoon, is value)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(razor blade, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(frying pan, is value)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(utensil, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cooking, has quality good)