utensil: have made of wood plastic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.66
, cooking
Weight: 0.52
, object
Weight: 0.52
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.77
, spoon
Weight: 0.74
, razor blade
Weight: 0.70
, frying pan
Weight: 0.64
, scissors
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have made of wood plastic 1.00
be made of plastic 0.92
be made of metal 0.83
be made of aluminum 0.83
be made up of metal 0.83
made of metal 0.83
be have plastic coating 0.83
be made of steel 0.81
have plastic handles 0.80
be made of stainless steel 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be made of steel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(scissors, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, have plastic handles)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be made of stainless steel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(frying pan, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(scissors, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(scissors, be made of metal)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(spoon, be made of metal)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(spoon, be made of steel)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(spoon, be made of steel)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(frying pan, have plastic handles)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(frying pan, have plastic handles)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(spoon, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(spoon, be made of stainless steel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(utensil, have made of wood plastic)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of metal)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(utensil, made of metal)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of metal)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(utensil, made of metal)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of metal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(utensil, made of metal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(utensil, be have plastic coating)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of steel)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of steel)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(utensil, be have plastic coating)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of steel)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(utensil, have plastic handles)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(utensil, be have plastic coating)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of stainless steel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(utensil, have plastic handles)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of stainless steel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of metal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(utensil, made of metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(utensil, have plastic handles)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of stainless steel)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of steel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of stainless steel)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic coating)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have plastic handles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(utensil, have made of wood plastic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(scissors, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(spoon, be made of steel)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(spoon, be made of metal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(frying pan, have plastic handles)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(spoon, be made of stainless steel)