utensil: have wooden handles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.66
, cooking
Weight: 0.52
, object
Weight: 0.52
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.77
, spoon
Weight: 0.74
, razor blade
Weight: 0.70
, frying pan
Weight: 0.64
, scissors
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have wooden handles 1.00
be provided with wooden handles 0.95
have plastic handles 0.90
have handles 0.89
handles have made 0.87
handles have made of bakelite 0.86
be provided with handles 0.83
have made of wood plastic 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, have plastic handles)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, have handles)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(frying pan, have handles)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(frying pan, have handles)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(frying pan, have plastic handles)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(frying pan, have plastic handles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(utensil, have wooden handles)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(utensil, have handles)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(utensil, be provided with wooden handles)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(utensil, handles have made)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(utensil, have handles)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(utensil, have handles)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(utensil, be provided with wooden handles)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(utensil, be provided with wooden handles)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(utensil, be provided with handles)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(utensil, handles have made)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(utensil, handles have made)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(utensil, have plastic handles)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be provided with wooden handles)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(utensil, have plastic handles)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(utensil, be provided with handles)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(utensil, have plastic handles)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(utensil, be provided with handles)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have plastic handles)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have handles)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(utensil, handles have made)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be provided with handles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have wooden handles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(utensil, have wooden handles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(frying pan, have plastic handles)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have wooden handles)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(frying pan, have handles)