utility: has state monopolies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.61
, service
Weight: 0.61
, water
Weight: 0.59
Siblings power line
Weight: 0.70
, electricity
Weight: 0.70
, power plant
Weight: 0.68
, gas
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state monopolies 1.00
be allowed monopolies 0.96
has state monopoly 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(utility, has state monopolies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(utility, has state monopolies)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(utility, has state monopolies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(utility, be allowed monopolies)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(utility, has state monopolies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(utility, has state monopoly)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(utility, has state monopolies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(utility, be allowed monopolies)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(utility, has state monopolies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(utility, be allowed monopolies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(utility, has state monopolies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(utility, has state monopoly)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(utility, has state monopolies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(utility, has state monopoly)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(utility, has state monopolies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(utility, be allowed monopolies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(utility, has state monopolies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(utility, has state monopoly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(utility, has state monopolies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(utility, has state monopolies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(utility, has state monopolies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(utility, has state monopolies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(utility, has state monopolies)