vacuole: be more important in plant cells

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organelle
Weight: 0.58
, compartment
Weight: 0.48
, term
Weight: 0.46
, vesicle
Weight: 0.43
, membrane
Weight: 0.34
Siblings lysosome
Weight: 0.47
, cell membrane
Weight: 0.36
, mitochondrion
Weight: 0.34
, nucleolus
Weight: 0.34
, cell wall
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more important in plant cells 1.00
be important in plant cells 0.99
be important for plant cells 0.99
be important to plant cells 0.98
be in plant cells 0.97
be needed in plant cells 0.97
be necessary in plant cells 0.96
be big in plant cells 0.96
be larger in plant cells 0.96
be important in plant cell 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, be important for plant cells)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, be important to plant cells)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, be necessary in plant cells)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, be in plant cells)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(cell wall, be in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(cell wall, be in plant cells)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(cell wall, be necessary in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cell wall, be necessary in plant cells)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cell wall, be important to plant cells)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cell wall, be important to plant cells)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cell wall, be important for plant cells)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cell wall, be important for plant cells)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be larger in plant cells)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be big in plant cells)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(vacuole, be larger in plant cells)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(vacuole, be in plant cells)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(vacuole, be in plant cells)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(vacuole, be larger in plant cells)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(vacuole, be in plant cells)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(vacuole, be big in plant cells)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(vacuole, be larger in plant cells)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be in plant cells)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(vacuole, be big in plant cells)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be important in plant cells)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(vacuole, be big in plant cells)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be needed in plant cells)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be important in plant cell)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(vacuole, be important in plant cells)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(vacuole, be needed in plant cells)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(vacuole, be important in plant cell)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(vacuole, be important in plant cells)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(vacuole, be important in plant cells)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(vacuole, be needed in plant cells)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(vacuole, be needed in plant cells)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(vacuole, be important in plant cell)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(vacuole, be important in plant cell)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(cell wall, be in plant cells)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cell wall, be necessary in plant cells)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cell wall, be important for plant cells)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be more important in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cell wall, be important to plant cells)