vacuole: be storage bins

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organelle
Weight: 0.58
, compartment
Weight: 0.48
, term
Weight: 0.46
, vesicle
Weight: 0.43
, membrane
Weight: 0.34
Siblings lysosome
Weight: 0.47
, cell membrane
Weight: 0.36
, mitochondrion
Weight: 0.34
, nucleolus
Weight: 0.34
, cell wall
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be storage bins 1.00
be like storage bins 0.99
be called storage sacs 0.77
be like cell recycling stations 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be storage bins)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lysosome, be like cell recycling stations)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vacuole, be storage bins)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(lysosome, be like cell recycling stations)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(lysosome, be like cell recycling stations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vacuole, be storage bins)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(vacuole, be storage bins)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(vacuole, be storage bins)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be like storage bins)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(vacuole, be storage bins)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(vacuole, be like storage bins)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(vacuole, be storage bins)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(vacuole, be like storage bins)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vacuole, be storage bins)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(vacuole, be like storage bins)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(vacuole, be storage bins)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be called storage sacs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(vacuole, be storage bins)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(vacuole, be called storage sacs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(vacuole, be storage bins)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(vacuole, be called storage sacs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vacuole, be storage bins)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(vacuole, be called storage sacs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(vacuole, be storage bins)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(vacuole, be storage bins)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be storage bins)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vacuole, be storage bins)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(vacuole, be storage bins)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(vacuole, be storage bins)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lysosome, be like cell recycling stations)