vacuum: lose suction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents environment
Weight: 0.64
, atmosphere
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings vacuum cleaner
Weight: 0.76
, outer space
Weight: 0.62
, friction
Weight: 0.32
, clean room
Weight: 0.32
, refrigeration
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
lose suction 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, lose suction)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, lose suction)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(vacuum, lose suction)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, lose suction)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, lose suction)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(vacuum, lose suction)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(vacuum, lose suction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(vacuum, lose suction)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(vacuum, lose suction)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, lose suction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(vacuum, lose suction)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(vacuum, lose suction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, lose suction)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, lose suction)