valley: be at montana

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents river
Weight: 0.62
, area
Weight: 0.62
, tree
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.52
Siblings rift valley
Weight: 0.74
, stream
Weight: 0.56
, death valley
Weight: 0.37
, greenwich village
Weight: 0.34
, town
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at montana 1.00
be at wisconsin 0.79
be at michigan 0.77
be a part of forrest 0.77
be used to bob ross paint 0.76
be at west virginia 0.76
be at utah 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(river, be at wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(valley, be at montana)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree, be a part of forrest)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(valley, be at montana)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(tree, be a part of forrest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(river, be at wisconsin)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(river, be at wisconsin)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(tree, be a part of forrest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(town, be at michigan)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(town, be at utah)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(river, be at wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(valley, be at montana)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree, be a part of forrest)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(valley, be at montana)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(town, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(town, be at michigan)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(town, be at utah)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(town, be at utah)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(valley, be at montana)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(valley, be used to bob ross paint)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(valley, be used to bob ross paint)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(valley, be at west virginia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at west virginia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(valley, be at west virginia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(valley, be at west virginia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(valley, be used to bob ross paint)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(valley, be used to bob ross paint)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at montana)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(valley, be at montana)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(river, be at wisconsin)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tree, be a part of forrest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(town, be at utah)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(town, be at michigan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(river, be at wisconsin)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(valley, be at montana)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tree, be a part of forrest)