valley: be at mountainous area

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents river
Weight: 0.62
, area
Weight: 0.62
, tree
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.52
Siblings rift valley
Weight: 0.74
, stream
Weight: 0.56
, death valley
Weight: 0.37
, greenwich village
Weight: 0.34
, town
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at mountainous area 1.00
be at mountainous region 0.96
be at mountainous state 0.95
be at hilly area 0.85
be at in mountain 0.83
be at mountain 0.82
be defined as area between two mountain 0.80
be at valley 0.80
be at rural area 0.79
be locate between mountain 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(river, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(valley, be at mountainous area)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tree, be at in mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(valley, be at mountainous area)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(valley, be at mountainous area)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(river, be at valley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(valley, be at mountainous area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(river, be at mountainous area)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tree, be at in mountain)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tree, be at mountain)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(river, be at valley)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(river, be at mountainous area)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at mountain)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in mountain)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(town, be at rural area)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(town, be at valley)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(river, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(valley, be at mountainous area)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tree, be at in mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(valley, be at mountainous area)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(valley, be at mountainous area)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(river, be at valley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(valley, be at mountainous area)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(town, be at valley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(town, be at valley)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(town, be at rural area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(valley, be at mountainous area)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(valley, be at mountainous state)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous state)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(valley, be at mountainous state)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(valley, be at mountainous region)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(valley, be at mountainous region)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(valley, be at hilly area)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(valley, be at mountainous region)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at hilly area)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(valley, be defined as area between two mountain)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(valley, be locate between mountain)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(valley, be at hilly area)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(valley, be locate between mountain)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(valley, be defined as area between two mountain)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(valley, be locate between mountain)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(valley, be defined as area between two mountain)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(valley, be defined as area between two mountain)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(valley, be at hilly area)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(valley, be locate between mountain)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(valley, be at mountainous state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(valley, be at mountainous area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(river, be at mountainous area)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tree, be at in mountain)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, be at valley)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tree, be at mountain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(town, be at valley)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(town, be at rural area)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(river, be at mountainous area)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tree, be at in mountain)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, be at valley)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(valley, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tree, be at mountain)