:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(river, form)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(valley, be form)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(valley, be form)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(river, form)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(valley, be form)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(river, form)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(valley, be form)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(town, form)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(river, form)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(valley, be form)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(valley, be form)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(valley, be form)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(town, form)
⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(town, form)
Salient implies Plausible
0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(valley, be form)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(valley, be form)
Similarity expansion
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(valley, be form)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(valley, form)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(valley, be form)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(valley, form)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(valley, be form)
⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(valley, form)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(valley, be form)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(valley, form)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(valley, be form)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(valley, be form)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(valley, be form)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(river, form)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(valley, be form)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(town, form)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(valley, be form)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(river, form)