valley: be warmer than mountains

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents river
Weight: 0.62
, area
Weight: 0.62
, tree
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.52
Siblings death valley
Weight: 0.37
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.35
, greenwich village
Weight: 0.34
, town
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be warmer than mountains 1.00
be hotter than mountains 0.93
is colder 0.87
be colder at night 0.83
is hotter 0.76
have lower amounts of precipitation 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(valley, be warmer than mountains)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(valley, is colder)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(valley, be colder at night)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(valley, be hotter than mountains)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(valley, be hotter than mountains)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(valley, be colder at night)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(valley, is colder)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(valley, is colder)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(valley, be colder at night)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(valley, be hotter than mountains)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(valley, is colder)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(valley, be colder at night)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(valley, be hotter than mountains)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(valley, is hotter)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(valley, have lower amounts of precipitation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(valley, is hotter)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(valley, have lower amounts of precipitation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(valley, is hotter)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(valley, have lower amounts of precipitation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(valley, is hotter)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(valley, have lower amounts of precipitation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(valley, be warmer than mountains)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(valley, be warmer than mountains)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(valley, be warmer than mountains)