:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(valley, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(valley, is hot)
Similarity expansion
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(valley, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(valley, get hot)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(valley, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(valley, get hot)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(valley, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(valley, get hot)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(valley, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(valley, is hotter)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(valley, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(valley, get hot)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(valley, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(valley, is hotter)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(valley, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(valley, is hottest)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(valley, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(valley, is hot)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings