value: be different from ethic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.66
, quantity
Weight: 0.64
, trait
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.69
, integrity
Weight: 0.68
, trust
Weight: 0.68
, equity
Weight: 0.67
, diversity
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from ethic 1.00
be important for organisation 's culture 0.77
be such important trait for politics 0.75
be important trait in politics 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(value, be different from ethic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(trust, be important trait in politics)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(value, be different from ethic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(trust, be such important trait for politics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(value, be different from ethic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(trust, be such important trait for politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(trust, be such important trait for politics)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(value, be different from ethic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(trust, be important trait in politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(trust, be important trait in politics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(value, be different from ethic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(value, be different from ethic)

Similarity expansion

0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(value, be different from ethic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(value, be important for organisation 's culture)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(value, be different from ethic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(value, be important for organisation 's culture)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(value, be different from ethic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(value, be important for organisation 's culture)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(value, be different from ethic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(value, be important for organisation 's culture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(value, be different from ethic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(value, be different from ethic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(value, be different from ethic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(value, be different from ethic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(value, be different from ethic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(value, be different from ethic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(trust, be important trait in politics)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(value, be different from ethic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(trust, be such important trait for politics)