value: be important in marketing

Related concepts

Parents	brand Weight: 0.66 , quantity Weight: 0.64 , trait Weight: 0.62 , subject Weight: 0.62
Siblings	fairness Weight: 0.69 , integrity Weight: 0.68 , trust Weight: 0.68 , equity Weight: 0.67 , diversity Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in marketing	1.00
be driven marketing important	0.90
be important for business	0.80
use advertising	0.79
be added important to business	0.77
be important in business world	0.77
do promotions	0.75
be important in company	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(brand, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(value, be important in marketing)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(brand, do promotions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(value, be important in marketing)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(brand, use advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(value, be important in marketing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(brand, be important in marketing)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(brand, use advertising)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Plausible(brand, do promotions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(brand, be important in marketing)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(brand, do promotions)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(brand, use advertising)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(integrity, be important in business world)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(diversity, be important for business)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(integrity, be important for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(brand, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(value, be important in marketing)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(brand, do promotions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(value, be important in marketing)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(brand, use advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(value, be important in marketing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(diversity, be important for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(diversity, be important for business)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(integrity, be important for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(integrity, be important for business)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(integrity, be important in business world) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(integrity, be important in business world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(value, be important in marketing)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(value, be driven marketing important)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(value, be driven marketing important)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(value, be driven marketing important)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(value, be added important to business)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(value, be important in company)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(value, be added important to business)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(value, be added important to business)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(value, be important in company)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(value, be important in company)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(value, be driven marketing important)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(value, be added important to business)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(value, be important in company)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(value, be important in marketing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(value, be important in marketing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(brand, use advertising)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(brand, be important in marketing)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(brand, do promotions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(integrity, be important in business world)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(diversity, be important for business)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(integrity, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(brand, be important in marketing)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(brand, use advertising)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(value, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(brand, do promotions)