value: be important to project

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.66
, quantity
Weight: 0.64
, trait
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.69
, integrity
Weight: 0.68
, trust
Weight: 0.68
, equity
Weight: 0.67
, diversity
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to project 1.00
be important in work 0.79
be important for sustainable development 0.78
be important to organisation 0.75
is important to study 0.75
be important in community 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(brand, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(value, be important to project)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(brand, be important to organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be important in work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(equity, be important for sustainable development)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be important in community)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(brand, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(value, be important to project)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(integrity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(integrity, be important in work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(equity, be important for sustainable development)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(equity, be important for sustainable development)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(diversity, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(diversity, be important in community)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(value, be important to project)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to project)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(value, be important to project)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(brand, be important to organisation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(equity, be important for sustainable development)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(integrity, be important in work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(diversity, be important in community)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(brand, be important to organisation)