van: be cheaper than suvs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motor vehicle
Weight: 0.69
, vehicle
Weight: 0.67
, trailer
Weight: 0.60
, artist
Weight: 0.56
Siblings caravan
Weight: 0.57
, pickup truck
Weight: 0.40
, truck
Weight: 0.38
, car
Weight: 0.38
, semi truck
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than suvs 1.00
is more expensive 0.86
is expensive 0.82
is cheap 0.78
insure than cars 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(trailer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(van, be cheaper than suvs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(trailer, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(van, be cheaper than suvs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(trailer, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(trailer, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(trailer, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(trailer, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pickup truck, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(semi truck, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(caravan, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(truck, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(pickup truck, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(trailer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(van, be cheaper than suvs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(trailer, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(van, be cheaper than suvs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(truck, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(truck, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(caravan, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(caravan, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(semi truck, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(semi truck, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pickup truck, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pickup truck, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(pickup truck, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pickup truck, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(van, be cheaper than suvs)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(van, is more expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(van, insure than cars)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(van, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(van, insure than cars)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(van, is cheap)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(van, is more expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(van, insure than cars)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(van, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(van, is cheap)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(van, is more expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(van, insure than cars)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(van, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(van, is cheap)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(van, is more expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(van, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(van, is cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(van, be cheaper than suvs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(trailer, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(trailer, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(caravan, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(semi truck, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pickup truck, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(truck, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pickup truck, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(trailer, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(van, be cheaper than suvs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(trailer, is cheap)