van: is best skate shoes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motor vehicle
Weight: 0.69
, vehicle
Weight: 0.67
, trailer
Weight: 0.60
, artist
Weight: 0.56
Siblings caravan
Weight: 0.57
, pickup truck
Weight: 0.40
, truck
Weight: 0.38
, car
Weight: 0.38
, semi truck
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best skate shoes 1.00
is good skate shoes 0.99
is skate shoes 0.98
is best shoes 0.85
is good shoes 0.83
have shoes 0.81
have expensive shoes 0.79
has state shoes 0.78
have long laces 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(van, is best skate shoes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(van, is best skate shoes)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(van, is best skate shoes)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(van, is good skate shoes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(van, is best skate shoes)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(van, is good skate shoes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(van, is best skate shoes)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(van, is good skate shoes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(van, is best skate shoes)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(van, is good skate shoes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(van, is best skate shoes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(van, is best shoes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(van, is best skate shoes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(van, have long laces)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(van, is best skate shoes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(van, is best shoes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(van, is best skate shoes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(van, is best shoes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(van, is best skate shoes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(van, have long laces)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(van, is best skate shoes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(van, is best shoes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(van, is best skate shoes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(van, have long laces)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(van, is best skate shoes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(van, have long laces)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(van, is best skate shoes)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(van, is best skate shoes)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(van, is best skate shoes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(van, is best skate shoes)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(van, is best skate shoes)