vanilla: is popular again

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents caramel
Weight: 0.70
, flavor
Weight: 0.62
, crop
Weight: 0.62
, chocolate
Weight: 0.61
, spice
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cinnamon
Weight: 0.36
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.35
, lemon juice
Weight: 0.35
, white chocolate
Weight: 0.35
, hazelnut
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is popular again 1.00
is popular 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(chocolate, is popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(vanilla, is popular again)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(vanilla, is popular again)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(chocolate, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vanilla, is popular again)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(chocolate, is popular)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(vanilla, is popular again)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(vanilla, is popular again)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(vanilla, is popular again)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(vanilla, is popular again)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(vanilla, is popular again)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(vanilla, is popular)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(vanilla, is popular again)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(vanilla, is popular)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(vanilla, is popular again)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(vanilla, is popular)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(vanilla, is popular again)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(vanilla, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(vanilla, is popular again)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(vanilla, is popular again)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vanilla, is popular again)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(vanilla, is popular again)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(vanilla, is popular again)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vanilla, is popular again)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(chocolate, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(vanilla, is popular again)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(chocolate, is popular)