variable: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, parameter
Weight: 0.60
, term
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.57
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.70
, density
Weight: 0.70
, frequency
Weight: 0.68
, volume
Weight: 0.67
, zip code
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality cost 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(variable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(variable, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(variable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(variable, has quality cost)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(variable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(variable, has quality cost)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(variable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(variable, has quality cost)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(variable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality cost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(variable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(variable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)