variation: be beneficial to species

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, amplitude
Weight: 0.58
, form
Weight: 0.57
, concept
Weight: 0.56
Siblings polymorphism
Weight: 0.66
, version
Weight: 0.63
, mutation
Weight: 0.58
, error
Weight: 0.58
, plural
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be beneficial to species 1.00
be beneficial for species 0.99
be important to species 0.93
be important in species 0.93
be in species important 0.93
be important for species 0.92
important for species 0.92
be good for species 0.91
be in species 0.90
be for species 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(variation, be beneficial to species)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(variation, be in species)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(variation, be for species)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(variation, be beneficial for species)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(variation, be in species)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(variation, be important in species)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(variation, be beneficial for species)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(variation, be for species)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(variation, be in species)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(variation, be beneficial for species)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(variation, be for species)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(variation, be important in species)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(variation, be good for species)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(variation, be important in species)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(variation, be important to species)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(variation, be important for species)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(variation, be beneficial for species)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(variation, be good for species)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(variation, be good for species)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(variation, be important to species)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(variation, be important for species)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(variation, be important to species)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(variation, be important to species)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(variation, be good for species)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(variation, be important for species)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(variation, be important for species)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(variation, be important in species)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(variation, be in species)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(variation, be for species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(variation, be beneficial to species)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(variation, be beneficial to species)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(variation, be beneficial to species)