vascular tissue: be advantage to plants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.73
, muscle
Weight: 0.58
, leaf
Weight: 0.48
, flower
Weight: 0.40
, cell
Weight: 0.36
Siblings spleen
Weight: 0.56
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.41
, xylem
Weight: 0.40
, bone cell
Weight: 0.38
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be advantage to plants 1.00
be advantage land 0.85
be in plants 0.85
be in plants important 0.83
be important in plants 0.83
be important to plants 0.83
survive than plants 0.81
be beneficial to plants 0.80
land plants 0.79
survive than nonvascular plants 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leaf, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tissue, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be important in plants)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(flower, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tissue, be in plants important)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tissue, be in plants important)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(flower, be important to plants)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(tissue, be important in plants)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tissue, be important to plants)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(leaf, be important to plants)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be important in plants)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be important to plants)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be in plants important)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(leaf, be important to plants)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(flower, be important to plants)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(xylem, be important to plants)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(xylem, be in plants)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leaf, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tissue, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be important in plants)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(flower, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tissue, be in plants important)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(xylem, be in plants)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(xylem, be in plants)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(xylem, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(xylem, be important to plants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be in plants)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(vascular tissue, be in plants)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be in plants)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(vascular tissue, be advantage land)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(vascular tissue, be in plants important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(vascular tissue, be important in plants)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(vascular tissue, survive than plants)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(vascular tissue, be important to plants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(vascular tissue, land plants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage land)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, survive than nonvascular plants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, survive than plants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(vascular tissue, survive than nonvascular plants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(vascular tissue, be beneficial to plants)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, survive than plants)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, survive than nonvascular plants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be in plants important)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, land plants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be in plants important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage land)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, land plants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage land)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be important to plants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be important to plants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be important in plants)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be important in plants)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, land plants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be beneficial to plants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be beneficial to plants)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be important in plants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be important to plants)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be in plants important)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be beneficial to plants)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be in plants)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, survive than plants)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, survive than nonvascular plants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tissue, be in plants important)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(flower, be important to plants)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tissue, be important in plants)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tissue, be important to plants)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(leaf, be important to plants)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tissue, be beneficial to plants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(xylem, be in plants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(xylem, be important to plants)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tissue, be in plants important)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(flower, be important to plants)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tissue, be important in plants)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tissue, be important to plants)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(leaf, be important to plants)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tissue, be beneficial to plants)