vega: cost more than new vegas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents show
Weight: 0.52
, star
Weight: 0.46
, thing
Weight: 0.45
, option
Weight: 0.44
, artist
Weight: 0.44
Siblings stock option
Weight: 0.30
, simpsons
Weight: 0.30
, puerto rican
Weight: 0.30
, sherlock
Weight: 0.30
, bono
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
cost more than new vegas 1.00
be cheaper than vegas 0.93
be cheaper than old vegas 0.91
be more expensive than 1080 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vega, cost more than new vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(vega, cost more than new vegas)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(vega, cost more than new vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(vega, be cheaper than vegas)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(vega, cost more than new vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vega, be cheaper than vegas)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(vega, cost more than new vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(vega, be cheaper than old vegas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(vega, cost more than new vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(vega, be cheaper than old vegas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(vega, cost more than new vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(vega, be cheaper than vegas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(vega, cost more than new vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(vega, be more expensive than 1080)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(vega, cost more than new vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(vega, be more expensive than 1080)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vega, cost more than new vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(vega, be cheaper than vegas)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vega, cost more than new vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(vega, be more expensive than 1080)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vega, cost more than new vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(vega, be cheaper than old vegas)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(vega, cost more than new vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(vega, be cheaper than old vegas)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(vega, cost more than new vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(vega, be more expensive than 1080)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(vega, cost more than new vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(vega, cost more than new vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(vega, cost more than new vegas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vega, cost more than new vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(vega, cost more than new vegas)