vegetarian: be better for environment

Related concepts

Parents	diet Weight: 0.60 , dish Weight: 0.57 , option Weight: 0.54 , topic Weight: 0.52 , group Weight: 0.51
Siblings	vegan Weight: 0.36 , potato salad Weight: 0.34 , sushi Weight: 0.34 , steak Weight: 0.34 , curry Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be better for environment	1.00
be bad for environment	0.93
has quality better	0.83
is more healthy	0.77
has quality good	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(vegetarian, be better for environment)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(diet, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(vegetarian, be better for environment)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(vegetarian, be better for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(diet, has quality better)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(option, has quality better)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(group, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(option, has quality better)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(diet, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(sushi, be bad for environment)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(steak, has quality better)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(sushi, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(curry, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(steak, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(vegetarian, be better for environment)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(diet, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(vegetarian, be better for environment)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(vegetarian, be better for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(sushi, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(sushi, be bad for environment)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(steak, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(steak, has quality better)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(steak, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(steak, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(curry, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(curry, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(sushi, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(sushi, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(potato salad, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(vegetarian, be better for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, is more healthy)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(vegetarian, is more healthy)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(vegetarian, is more healthy)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(vegetarian, is more healthy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(vegetarian, be better for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(diet, has quality better)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(option, has quality better)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(group, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(sushi, be bad for environment)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(steak, has quality better)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(steak, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(curry, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(sushi, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(potato salad, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(diet, has quality better)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(option, has quality better)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(vegetarian, be better for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(group, has quality good)