vegetation: be at top at bottom

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, surface
Weight: 0.56
Siblings tree branch
Weight: 0.68
, poison ivy
Weight: 0.67
, heather
Weight: 0.66
, tree
Weight: 0.62
, grass
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at top at bottom 1.00
be at top 0.93
be at top of mountain at bottom 0.92
be at top of mountain different at bottom 0.91
be at top of tall mountain at bottom 0.88
be at top of tall mountain different at bottom 0.87
be at top of mountain different from vegetation at bottom 0.82
be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation at bottom 0.80
be at top of mountain 0.80
be at top of mountain different 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at top of mountain)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(tree, be at top of mountain)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(tree, be at top of mountain)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top at bottom)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at top)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different at bottom)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of mountain different at bottom)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of mountain at bottom)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top of mountain different at bottom)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain at bottom)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different at bottom)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top of mountain at bottom)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of mountain)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at top of mountain different at bottom)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain at bottom)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of mountain different at bottom)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different at bottom)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of mountain at bottom)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at top of mountain at bottom)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top of mountain)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different at bottom)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain at bottom)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of mountain different)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain at bottom)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of mountain different)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top of mountain different)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of mountain)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation at bottom)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at top of mountain different)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of mountain different from vegetation at bottom)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of mountain different from vegetation at bottom)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation at bottom)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at top of mountain different from vegetation at bottom)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top of mountain different from vegetation at bottom)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at top of mountain)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation at bottom)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation at bottom)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top at bottom)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top at bottom)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top at bottom)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tree, be at top of mountain)