vehicle: have shockers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motor vehicle
Weight: 0.80
, electronic device
Weight: 0.63
, diesel
Weight: 0.62
, automobile
Weight: 0.62
Siblings pickup truck
Weight: 0.83
, police car
Weight: 0.79
, armored car
Weight: 0.77
, dump truck
Weight: 0.77
, station wagon
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
have shockers 1.00
be provided with shockers 0.94
be fitted with shockers 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(automobile, be provided with shockers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(vehicle, have shockers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(vehicle, have shockers)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(automobile, be provided with shockers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(vehicle, have shockers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(automobile, be provided with shockers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(automobile, be provided with shockers)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(vehicle, have shockers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(vehicle, have shockers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(vehicle, have shockers)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(vehicle, have shockers)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(vehicle, have shockers)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(vehicle, be fitted with shockers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(vehicle, have shockers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(vehicle, be fitted with shockers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(vehicle, have shockers)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(vehicle, be fitted with shockers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(vehicle, have shockers)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(vehicle, be fitted with shockers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(vehicle, have shockers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(vehicle, have shockers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(vehicle, have shockers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(vehicle, have shockers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(vehicle, have shockers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(vehicle, have shockers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(automobile, be provided with shockers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(vehicle, have shockers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(automobile, be provided with shockers)