vendor: be due important diligence

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents third party
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.59
, supplier
Weight: 0.59
, party
Weight: 0.59
, merchant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings caterer
Weight: 0.58
, macromedia
Weight: 0.45
, cro
Weight: 0.43
, labour party
Weight: 0.34
, salesperson
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be due important diligence 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(supplier, be due important diligence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(vendor, be due important diligence)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(vendor, be due important diligence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(supplier, be due important diligence)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(vendor, be due important diligence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(supplier, be due important diligence)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(supplier, be due important diligence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(vendor, be due important diligence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(vendor, be due important diligence)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(vendor, be due important diligence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(vendor, be due important diligence)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(vendor, be due important diligence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(vendor, be due important diligence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(vendor, be due important diligence)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(vendor, be due important diligence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(vendor, be due important diligence)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(vendor, be due important diligence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(supplier, be due important diligence)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(vendor, be due important diligence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(supplier, be due important diligence)