vendor: get hacked

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents third party
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.59
, supplier
Weight: 0.59
, party
Weight: 0.59
, merchant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings caterer
Weight: 0.58
, macromedia
Weight: 0.45
, cro
Weight: 0.43
, labour party
Weight: 0.34
, salesperson
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
get hacked 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(vendor, get hacked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(vendor, get hacked)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(vendor, get hacked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(vendor, get hacked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(vendor, get hacked)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(vendor, get hacked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(vendor, get hacked)