vendor: price product

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.59
, supplier
Weight: 0.59
, party
Weight: 0.59
, merchant
Weight: 0.59
, employee
Weight: 0.59
Siblings grocer
Weight: 0.44
, buyer
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
price product 1.00
price retail item 0.86
price merchandise 0.84
be at market 0.79
present new product 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(merchant, be at market)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(vendor, price product)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(merchant, be at market)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(merchant, be at market)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(merchant, be at market)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(vendor, price product)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(vendor, price product)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(vendor, price retail item)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(vendor, price merchandise)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(vendor, price retail item)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(vendor, price retail item)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(vendor, price merchandise)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(vendor, present new product)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(vendor, price merchandise)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(vendor, be at market)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(vendor, present new product)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(vendor, price retail item)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(vendor, be at market)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(vendor, present new product)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(vendor, be at market)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(vendor, price merchandise)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(vendor, be at market)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(vendor, present new product)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(vendor, price product)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(vendor, price product)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(merchant, be at market)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(vendor, price product)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(merchant, be at market)