venture capitalist: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	financial institution Weight: 0.69 , investor Weight: 0.66 , entrepreneur Weight: 0.66 , financier Weight: 0.64 , company Weight: 0.63
Siblings	corporation Weight: 0.35 , software company Weight: 0.34 , business Weight: 0.34 , investment Weight: 0.33 , oil company Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(venture capitalist, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(software company, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(venture capitalist, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(oil company, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(venture capitalist, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(venture capitalist, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(corporation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(venture capitalist, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(investment, has quality bad)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(venture capitalist, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(corporation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(corporation, has quality bad)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(venture capitalist, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(oil company, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(oil company, has quality bad)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(venture capitalist, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(software company, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(software company, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(venture capitalist, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(venture capitalist, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(venture capitalist, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(venture capitalist, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(venture capitalist, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(venture capitalist, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(venture capitalist, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(venture capitalist, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(investment, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(venture capitalist, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(corporation, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(venture capitalist, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(software company, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(venture capitalist, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(oil company, has quality bad)